Diagnostic Accuracy of Pulse Pressure Variation Compared to Thoracic Fluid Content in Mechanically Ventilated Patients after Cardiac Surgery

Authors Information
Article Notes and Dates
To Cite : Ghadrdoost B, Bakhshandeh H, Ziyaeifard M, Farasatkish R, Babaei T, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Pulse Pressure Variation Compared to Thoracic Fluid Content in Mechanically Ventilated Patients after Cardiac Surgery, Multidiscip Cardio Annal. 2017 ;8(2):e10662. doi: 10.5812/mcardia.10662.
Copyright: Copyright © 2017, Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Annals. .
Abstract
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
References
  • 1. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H, Easton P, Ferland A. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest. 2004;126(5):1563-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.5.1563. [PubMed: 15539728].
  • 2. Magder S, Bafaqeeh F. The clinical role of central venous pressure measurements. J Intensive Care Med. 2007;22(1):44-51. doi: 10.1177/0885066606295303. [PubMed: 17259568].
  • 3. Mesquida J, Gruartmoner G, Garc�a X. Fluid optimization strategies in critical care patients. OA Critical Care. 2013;1(1):4. doi: 10.13172/2052-9309-1-1-502.
  • 4. Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-1-1. [PubMed: 21906322].
  • 5. Fischer MO, Pelissier A, Bohadana D, Gerard JL, Hanouz JL, Fellahi JL. Prediction of responsiveness to an intravenous fluid challenge in patients after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison between arterial pulse pressure variation and digital plethysmographic variability index. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27(6):1087-93. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.02.024. [PubMed: 23992654].
  • 6. Yazigi A, Khoury E, Hlais S, Madi-Jebara S, Haddad F, Hayek G, et al. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in elderly patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26(3):387-90. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.09.014. [PubMed: 22100211].
  • 7. de Waal EE, Rex S, Kruitwagen CL, Kalkman CJ, Buhre WF. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(2):510-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181958bf7. [PubMed: 19114886].
  • 8. Sander M, Spies CD, Berger K, Grubitzsch H, Foer A, Kramer M, et al. Prediction of volume response under open-chest conditions during coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care. 2007;11(6):R121. doi: 10.1186/cc6181. [PubMed: 18034888].
  • 9. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Assessment of volume responsiveness during mechanical ventilation: recent advances. Crit Care. 2013;17(2):217. doi: 10.1186/cc12526. [PubMed: 23510457].
  • 10. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(1):134-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.1.9903035. [PubMed: 10903232].
  • 11. van de Water JM, Mount BE, Chandra KM, Mitchell BP, Woodruff TA, Dalton ML. TFC (thoracic fluid content): a new parameter for assessment of changes in chest fluid volume. Am Surg. 2005;71(1):81-6. [PubMed: 15757064].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiaion Alert via Google Reader

Cited By: